I understand it's a tough problem, but I think you ahould not endorse over very marginal differences if the candidate is net bad on your issue.
One, candidates have no incentive to be better than marginal. Two, people usually decide who to vote for on mutiple dimensions, i.e. are not single-issue voters. Telling people they have two bad candidates on housing is still useful.
I understand it's a tough problem, but I think you ahould not endorse over very marginal differences if the candidate is net bad on your issue.
One, candidates have no incentive to be better than marginal. Two, people usually decide who to vote for on mutiple dimensions, i.e. are not single-issue voters. Telling people they have two bad candidates on housing is still useful.